Very Low-Cost Kinetic Defeat for C-sUAS
AI Overview
The Air Force seeks low-cost kinetic defeat systems to neutralize small unmanned aircraft threats at under $6,000 per engagement. Solutions must feature autonomous guidance, GPS-denied operation, and multi-target capability to address the cost-inefficiency of current interceptors against commercial drone swarms.
This summary is AI-generated from the official solicitation.
Key Details
Official Description
This Department of the Air Force (DAF) focused open topic seeks C-sUAS defeat options for transition into the USAF and USSF, with a specific focus on transitioning technologies to AFLCMC/ES and the Joint Interagency Task Force 401 (JIATF 401) marketplace. We seek the development and application of highly dispersible, survivable, and scalable kinetic defeat mechanisms capable of neutralizing Group 1-3 UAS threats. This includes, but is not limited to, novel interceptor/munitions designs that achi...
Change History
Very Low-Cost Kinetic Defeat for C-sUAS
**Q&A Updates Summary:** Four questions received answers. Key clarifications: (1) Integrated demonstration with Medusa is expected as final deliverable; (2) Teaming arrangements are acceptable for interceptor prototype, guidance/autonomy software, and C2 framework integration; (3) Prior integration experience not required, credible path sufficient; (4) Net capture approved as defeat method; (5) Integration assumes existing government-defined interfaces (Medusa C2 SDK).
Very Low-Cost Kinetic Defeat for C-sUAS
**Q&A Changes Summary:** Added 1 new question (Q1) regarding feasibility of proposing an actual Medusa integration demonstration with Government support. Previous questions on teaming arrangements, autonomy-focused proposals, integration paths, net capture methods, and C2 framework integration were renumbered but appear substantively unchanged.
Very Low-Cost Kinetic Defeat for C-sUAS
**Summary of Q&A Changes:** Added 3 new questions clarifying key technical approach flexibility: (1) teaming arrangements between guidance/autonomy and interceptor providers vs. single offeror requirement, (2) proposals emphasizing autonomy/guidance software with COTS airframes, and (3) D2P2 feasibility expectations regarding prior C2 framework integration vs. credible integration pathway. Original 2 questions on net capture methods and C-sUAS integration scope retained.
Very Low-Cost Kinetic Defeat for C-sUAS
Added Q1 clarifying that net capture is an acceptable C-UAS defeat method for this topic.
Very Low-Cost Kinetic Defeat for C-sUAS
This Q&A clarifies that Direct-to-Phase II proposers should plan to integrate with existing government C-sUAS interfaces rather than design custom integration approaches, narrowing the scope and reducing technical variability in proposals.
Very Low-Cost Kinetic Defeat for C-sUAS
New opportunity: Very Low-Cost Kinetic Defeat for C-sUAS
Similar Opportunities
Get Alerts for Opportunities Like This
RallyProp monitors thousands of funding sources and sends instant alerts when opportunities match your technology and capabilities.
Start Free Trial